-
Fischer, who may or may
not be mad as a hatter, has every right to
be horrified. -- Jeremy Silman (on changes
made to the new edition of My 60 Memorable
Games)
-
He just wouldn't listen
to reason. -- Larry Evans (on Fischer)
-
Fischer is a law unto
himself. -- Larry Evans
-
Even as a boy, Bobby was
his own man. He knew what he wanted, he felt
that he knew what was right, and he made his
own decisions. Once convinced of something,
his integrity, pride and absolute
independence ruled out any compromise. Once
he made up his mind there was no changing
it. Many often had a go at it; Ethel and I
never did. And even when the general
consensus was that he was dead wrong, it
turned out more often than not that he was
right. As the heart has its own reasons, so
has genius. -- Jack Collins
-
Fischer became paranoid
about giving away his secrets. -- Larry
Evans
-
Fischer is under
obligation to nobody. -- Joseph Platz
-
I guess a certain amount
of temperament is expected of geniuses. --
Ron Gross
-
The huge egos of great
chess players are legendary. Psychologists
have been amazed by their vanity, have
studied it, and anecdotes concerning it are
abundant. But never before has there been
such a prima donna as Bobby. Already he has
managed to alienate and offend almost
everybody in the chess world. That includes
officials, patrons, writers, almost
everybody and anybody who might be in a
position to help him in his career. -- Al
Horowitz
-
It is, sadly, altogether
too easy, in fact effortless, to find
legions of people, not just chess players,
who have every reason to say, and have (and
please believe me that I do not do this out
of spite or rancor) from the earliest days
of Fischer's career to this very day, he has
been labeled: brash, arrogant, selfish,
self-centered, boorish, loutish, cruel,
unreasonable, difficult, impossible,
inconsiderate, ungrateful, petty, petulant,
sulking, crass, insensitive, irrational,
contentious, argumentative, aggravating,
insulting, crazy, wicked, and mad. I would
tend to agree. -- Paul Kollar
-
He has hurt and abandoned
those who have helped him, those who have
admired him, and those who have loved him.
He has rejected calls from his friends, his
community of fellow chess players, and from
his country to do what was right or fitting.
He has displayed a McCarthyite,
commie-bashing, jingoistic political stance
while inexplicably avoiding military
service, despite having been a 1A-draft
candidate, attaining a very convenient
rejection from his local draft board. His
erstwhile cold war patriotism was later much
diluted by his defying, and spitting upon,
State Department edicts. He skulked away
from the first challenge he had for the, not
his, world title, and was happy to let the
world think he was victimized. He cloaked
his fearful evasion with an over- elaborate
pretense of remaining steadfast and
principled, a favorite trick of his, and
gulled many thanklessly loyal supporters
into making tortured and quasi-moral excuses
for him. Yet before this pathetic farce, he
played not one single game, not one, as
champion. What cabal or KGB conspiracy was
responsible for this craven non-
performance? -- Paul Kollar
-
Ironically, if Fischer
had behaved impeccably at Reykjavik, his
overall superior skill would have carried
him through anyway; such was the level of
his play then. And if Fischer, three years
later, gave FIDE, or even Karpov, the right
to decide all the match issues, and behaved
as graciously as any perfect host, he would
have won that match too. He was inhumanly
great. He was indisputably the best chess
player of all time. But this is very
difficult for some of us to see and admit
unless we turn off all peripheral vision,
and suspend all moral judgments
until...when? Is near-perfect chess worth
this sacrifice? If we were to learn,
nightmarishly, that Beethoven was an
arsonist, or an abuser of children, would
his string quartets still thrill and lift
us? It's a bit of a dilemma. What can we
legitimately excuse for the sake of art?
Fischer has not, of course, physically hurt
anyone. But he has, in my opinion, been
guilty of chronic, execrable bad behavior
for forty plus years. He has, by repeated,
continual assaults on common standards of
decency and social decorum, approached, if
not reached, the level of the sociopath. His
actions immediately before the match at
Reykjavik and during the first three games
should have resulted in a permanent censure,
or at least a day or two in the stocks. --
Paul Kollar
-
Fischer sacrificed
virtually everything most of us "weakies"
(to use his term) value, respect, and
cherish, for the sake of an artful, often
beautiful board game, for the ambivalent
privilege of being its greatest master. He
even sacrificed his mother, Regina, to
become the King of Chess. Anything is
permissible if it wins...sac the queen...the
king's the thing...isn't it, Father?
Wherever you are, isn't it? -- Paul Kollar
-
He is an American chess
tragedy on par with Morphy and Pillsbury. --
Mig Greengard (on Fischer)
-
Bobby Fischer’s current
state of mind is indeed a tragedy. One of
the world’s greatest chess players - the
pride and sorrow of American chess. -- Frank
Brady (on Fischer)
-
Regardless of Bobby’s
recent hate-filled rantings, which I abhor,
he is nonetheless one of the greatest
chessplayers of all time. -- Frank Brady
-
The Unknown remains,
probably forever inexplicable, regardless of
how many yellowed game scores, cracked
newspaper clippings, and curled and faded
old photos are uncovered. My appreciation,
even awe at his chess talent aside, the
nicest thing I can say about Bobby Fischer
is that he's a genuine enigma. -- Paul
Kollar
-
You want to know what I
want? I'll tell you what I want. I want back
what Bobby Fischer took with him when he
disappeared. -- Ben Kingsley (from Searching
For Bobby Fischer)
-
What is chess, do you
think? Those who play for fun or not at all
dismiss it as a game. The ones who devote
their lives to it for the most part insist
that it's a science. It's neither. Bobby
Fischer got underneath it like no one before
and found at its center, art. -- Ben
Kingsley (from Searching For Bobby Fischer)
-
The beauty of his games,
the clarity of his play, and the brilliance
of his ideas have made him an artist of the
same stature as Brahms, Rembrandt, and
Shakespeare. -- David Levy (on Fischer)
-
Chess is not to him a
means to an end, a subsidized sport, a forum
for testing philosophic hypotheses, or an
outlet for baser emotions. To Fischer, chess
is an end in itself. -- Anthony Saidy
-
I regard him as a
mythological combination of sorts, a centaur
if you will, a synthesis between man and
chess. -- Garry Kasparov (on Fischer)
-
If one may judge a
player's strength by comparing him with his
contemporaries, it seems to me that
Fischer's achievement is unsurpassed. The
gap between him and his closest rivals was
the widest there ever was between a World
Champion and the other top-ranking players
of his time. He was some 10-15 years ahead
of his time in his preparation and
understanding. This could be attributed in
part to his dedication to the game, which
was unequaled by any other player before or
since. -- Garry Kasparov
-
It’s impossible to
compare two players from different epochs.
It’s extremely unfair because we know more
now and also because my opponents are
stronger than those Fischer had to face. I
am not trying to underestimate Fischer’s
achievements! The only real point of
comparison between the two of us is the size
of the gaps between ourselves and our
respective opponents. I think that the gap
between Fischer and his opponents is still
the widest in chess history. The only
possible way to compare Fischer, Botvinnik,
Morphy, Steinitz and Kasparov is to place
them in the context of their eras and to
measure the distance between themselves and
their opponents. Fischer’s distance was
vast! -- Garry Kasparov
-
By this measure, I
consider him the greatest world champion. --
Garry Kasparov (on the gap between Fischer &
his contemporaries)
-
Bobby never cared about
money, though. His only desire was to prove
that his choices were correct: He wanted
chess to be important, because he was a
chess player, and he wanted to be important.
Bobby knew money was important, but he
didn't have a clue why, outside of clothes
and status. The only way he could accomplish
what he wanted was to fight for a lot of
money. Once he got it, he gave it away. He
did not know how to spend it. And once he'd
become champion, after, essentially,
sacrificing his life for it, he didn't know
how to spend his time. -- Bob Wade
-
There's no doubt that the
title meant something to him. It meant more
than anything. Proof of that is the fact
that after winning it he stopped competing.
But with or without the title, Bobby Fischer
was unquestionably the greatest player of
his time. -- Burt Hochberg
|
|